
11-10-2007, 03:29 AM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2
|
|
Kirby vaccum or Dyson?
I know everyone's hyped about the Dyson, but I just had a Kirby sales person come by.. and MAAAN, they took out the stains in my carpet! I don't think a Dyson can shampoo a rug like that!
|

11-10-2007, 03:30 AM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1
|
|
well : " Kirby is the Best Vaccum "
|

11-10-2007, 03:30 AM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2
|
|
well then get the Kirby!!
|

11-12-2007, 06:04 PM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 8
|
|
Re: Kirby vaccum or Dyson?
There is no comparison. The Kirby is superior in every aspect, #1 quality, with proper care a kirby will last 25 years, #2 performance Kirby uses a direct air motor that is far superior to dysons made for them panasonic motor # filtration using kirby's heapa filtration throw away bags is much more sanitary than bagless. Think of it this way do you use bags in your trash can or just throw the rubbish in the waste basket without a bag?
|

04-15-2008, 08:58 PM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 8
|
|
Re: Kirby vaccum or Dyson?
Quote:
Originally Posted by vacgeek
There is no comparison. The Kirby is superior in every aspect, #1 quality, with proper care a kirby will last 25 years, #2 performance Kirby uses a direct air motor that is far superior to dysons made for them panasonic motor # filtration using kirby's heapa filtration throw away bags is much more sanitary than bagless. Think of it this way do you use bags in your trash can or just throw the rubbish in the waste basket without a bag?
|
I completely agree!
I have four 70s model Kirbys (three 77+ CIIIs and one 79 Tradition) and they outdo my Bissell Powerforce (bagged) and even bagged Hoover Windtunnel Lites. They make more suction at low speed than a new non-Kirby brand makes at high speed.
(Sure starting off my new membership with a bang, huh? :P)
|

07-19-2008, 07:19 PM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1
|
|
Re: Kirby vaccum or Dyson?
I just had a demonstration on the Kirby and I traded in my Dyson without a second thought. We had purchased the dyson pet vac because our dog sheds like crazy. The kirby toatally put the dyson to shame. I was embarrassed at how much the kirby got out of our carpet.
|

07-31-2008, 11:14 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 33
|
|
新加的空白文章1
I found a new style of jordan fusion shoes--- Air Jordan Fusion 9, [url=http://www.oknike.com/index.php?main_page=index&cPath=11]Air Jordan Fusion 9[url] shoes feather with the Air Jordan 9 IX shoes face and Air Force Ones shoes bottom, they released a couple of different color ways for Air Jordan Fusion 9, please see the pictures from our [url=http://www.oknike.com]Jordan Shoes[url online album below.  And you can find more different colors of air jordan fusion 9 shoes on www.oknike.com.
|

08-01-2008, 11:54 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 52
|
|
What Activision Can And Can't Change About Blizzard
buy WoW gold The development talent at Blizzard now has a new publisher and parent in Activision Blizzard. If you ask the developers, they're enthusiastic about the change. "All game development is still completely within our Irvine headquarters," World of Warcraft game director Jeffrey Kaplan told Kotaku during our sit-down today. "There's no outside influence at all in the development of Diablo 3, StarCraft 2 or buy WoW gold ."In fact, Blizzard sees an upside to being hitched to the Activision star. "They have a lot of expertise in the console area, where we're very-headed in addition to PC and online," Kaplan said."Activision's point of view is, there's a lot of trust in Blizzard and what we do. Activision's just trying to figure out how we work and try to learn from us."But Activision's an ambitious company. CEO Bobby Kotick has talked in the past about monetizing massively multiplayer environments, competing with iTunes, even evolving pricing models for consoles. Does Activision have the power to change the way Blizzard monetizes WoW, if it wants to?"Theoretically they could, if they wanted to," Kaplan said.Blizzard has always staunchly bucked the trend in online games that seems to be considering microtransactions, ad-supported freebies, and other alternate revenue streams as opposed to the subscription model, which many people theorize is going the way of the dinosaur. Blizzard has always said it favors balanced gameplay as opposed to alternate biz models, and according to Kaplan, this is still the case."We would always do whatever's coolest for the game," he said. "A great example of this is our paid character transfer service, which in its own way is sort of a microtransaction within buy WoW gold . The reason we introduced that service was because we thought it was a benefit that wow players needed, and the pricing model was put there as a barrier to entry, not a source of revenue."Free transfers for everybody, Kaplan said, would do bad things to the community and realm populations, but Blizzard still wanted to provide the service as an option for legitimate cases where players do need to transfer realms."We would look towards other microtransactions, or services we would charge for, but not with the intention of 'oh, here's this great source of revenue,'" he said.Jay Wilson, lead designer on Diablo III, summed up the developer's policy on the microtransactions issue: "I think we always look to make the game we want to make, and then figure out the kind of financial model that works with that game."But business-savvy Activision, aiming for top-tier publisher, does have the power to change that financial model. So is Blizzard worried?"I'm not concerned at this point at all," said Kaplan. "What's important to note about Blizzard is that we've had many owners over the years. Our executive staff, sort of the first thing they do whenever we get bought by somebody else, is to go through this big training process of, 'this is what makes us successful. If you mess with this, you're going to mess with your own revenue at this point.'Blizzard CEO Mike Morhaime and COO Paul Sams are "extremely talented," Kaplan said, at working with publishers to communicate Blizzard's philosophy."Our track record has been pretty golden over the years," said Kaplan. "With Burning Crusade, we could have put it out in the Fall and gotten all of the Christmas revenue — who wouldn't have wanted that? But everyone agreed that if we worked on it for two more months... it was a better long term decision.""And short term decision," added Blizzard associate PR manager Bob Colayco, pointing out that the expansion helped keep WoW at the top of the charts since it launched. Kaplan said, as someone who's "very much a gamer, and into games first and foremost," he was excited by the Activision news. "I'm excited because of the games they're making right now," he said. "I thought Call of Duty 4 kicked ass. I had that in my top five games of last year. I thought it was brilliant — the way Infinity Ward executed on CoD4 reminded me of what Blizzard values." buy WoW gold "It wasn't about innovation... it was all about execution, and how well they executed on every single idea, and the level of polish was just awesome. Knowing we're partnered with people who have some of the same values... that's really exciting."buy wow gold
|

08-16-2008, 03:21 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 85
|
|
sell swg credits to us www.virdeal.com
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:00 PM. |
|
|
|
|